Impossibility theorem of Pareto liberal

Public.icon

I can't understand what is being written overalltkgshn.icon*3

from http://www.f.waseda.jp/ksuga/ecoinq0304.pdf

https://gyazo.com/d6e1bfeaa65ea1b7214f829026319ef0

Evaluation of Amartya Sen's theorem

https://gyazo.com/13a33441a95417f714eb4ec74c975f0f

I don't really understand the Pareto principlePrevious companies, interviews and appearances related to oneself.icon

Search more

Amartya Sen's Impossibility theorem of Pareto liberal

Layer of consensus formation

http://plaza.umin.ac.jp/~kodama/ethics/wordbook/arrow.html

Amartya Sen, "Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory", Kenichi Oba and Takashi Kawamoto translation, Keiso Shobo, 1989

If you read the example of "Lady Chatterley's Lover" in Chapter 1, "Impossibility of Pareto Liberalism", you will understand the story of Arrow's theorem.

Amartya Sen, "Collective Choice and Social Welfare", supervised by Motoyoshi Shida, Keiso Shobo, 2000

It seems to be a must-read for social choice theory. See Chapter 3 and 6.2.

Richard Tuck, `The Contribution of History', in Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit ed., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 1993, 72-89.

Refer to this for the impact of Arrow's theorem on the history of thought.

Geoffrey Brennan, `The contribution of economics', in Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit ed., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 1993, 123-156.

According to this person's interpretation, what Arrow's theorem implies is that it is necessary to compare the utility between individuals to give a meaningful sense of "public interest" (p. 136).